NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.

NANO Nuclear Energy Class Action Update: Johnson Fistel Alerts Shareholders of Ongoing Class Action Proceedings

Johnson Fistel, LLP, a law firm specializing in shareholder rights, has announced the initiation of class action lawsuits on behalf of investors of NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. Investors are encouraged to review the deadlines listed and submit their information. If you suffered a loss and are interested in learning more about being a lead plaintiff, please contact Jim Baker (jimb@johnsonfistel.com) by email or phone at 619-814-4471. If emailing, please include a phone number.

If you suffered a loss on your investment and would like to inquire about joining an action to recover your loss under the federal securities laws, please complete the form below. The information provided will be held in strict confidence unless and until you authorize us to disclose it.
Name(Required)
Would you like to receive future case and securities updates from Johnson Fistel, LLP via email?(Required)
Would you like to receive information about Johnson Fistel, LLP's free portfolio monitoring service?(Required)
By checking the box, I acknowledge that this form is not intended to and does not establish an attorney-client relationship between myself and Johnson Fistel, LLP, and that submission to or receipt of information from the firm or one of its attorneys via this form, website, email, or telephone does not create an attorney-client relationship.(Required)

The filed complaint alleges that defendants made false statements and/or concealed that:  a) NNE’s purported progress toward regulatory approval for the design of its planned micro reactors and fuel fabrication plant was nonexistent; b) NNE’s timelines for commercialization were wildly optimistic, at best, and most likely impossible; c) the foregoing issues were likely to have a material negative impact on the Company’s projected revenues and growth; d) as a result, the Company’s financial position and/or prospects were overstated; and e) as a result, defendants’ public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.